The significance of Melchizedek 7:1–10
The writer began by explaining the significance of Melchizedek since understanding him is foundational to appreciating Jesus Christ’s high priestly ministry.[227],” Biblica 55 (1974):333–48.
“The dominant text in 7:1–10 is Gen 14:17–20 LXX, but in chap. 7 as a whole Gen 14:17–20 is subordinated to Ps 110:4 …
“The limits of the first section are confirmed literarily by an inclusio established between vv 1 and 10 by the repeated statement that Melchizedek met Abraham.”[228]
The particulars of Melchizedek’s significance 7:1–3
7:1–2 The writer referred to Melchizedek (lit. righteous king, probably a title rather than a proper name) as the head of a priestly order. It was not uncommon for one individual to combine the roles of priest and king in antiquity.[229] Aaron was also the head of a priestly order. The writer explained that Jesus Christ was a member of Melchizedek’s order, not Aaron’s (6:20). Melchizedek was a prototype of Jesus Christ in two respects. He was both a king and a priest, and what characterized him was righteousness and peace (cf. 12:10–11; Ps. 85:10; Isa. 32:17; Rom. 5:1; James 3:17–18). The fact that Melchizedek was a priest is clear from two facts: he blessed Abraham, and Abraham paid tithes to him of all the spoils that he had taken in war (v. 4; cf. Gen. 14:23–24). According to Moffatt, the Jews under the Mosaic Covenant did not pay tithes from the spoils of war.[230] This was a pagan custom.
These verses point out four important facts about Melchizedek: (1) he was a king-priest, (2) he was a blesser, (3) he received tithes, and (4) he had a significant name.
7:3a Limiting our knowledge of Melchizedek to what Moses (Genesis) specifically stated, this first priest mentioned in Scripture had no parents or children and no birth or death. In this, too, he represented the eternal Son of God. It was essential that the Levitical priests be able to prove their ancestry (cf. Ezra 2:61–63; Neh. 7:63–65). Since Moses did not record Melchizedek’s death, this writer could say that he continued as a priest forever, another respect in which he was like Jesus Christ.
“When nothing is recorded of the parentage of this man, it is not necessarily to be assumed that he had no parents but simply that the absence of the record is significant.
“What was true of Melchizedek simply as a matter of record was true of Christ in a fuller and more literal sense. So the silence of the Scripture points to an important theological truth… . Thus it is not that Melchizedek sets the pattern and Jesus follows it. Rather, the record about Melchizedek is so arranged that it brings out certain truths, that apply far more fully to Jesus than they do to Melchizedek. With the latter, these truths are simply a matter of record; but with Jesus they are not only historically true, they also have significant spiritual dimensions.”[232]
“It is when the writer bases his exposition on the silence of Scripture that his method of exegesis seems strangest to modern readers.
“The idea of basing exegesis on silence is familiar in Philo’s writings and would not in itself have seemed strange to Jewish readers.”[233]
This verse highlights a fifth important fact about Melchizedek: he had a significant family history.
The exposition of Melchizedek’s significance 7:4–10
In these straightforward verses, which expound verses 1–3, the writer explained further how Melchizedek was superior to Abraham, the ancestor of Levi, the head of the priestly tribe under the Old (Mosaic) Covenant. He said more about three of the facts mentioned above: Melchizedek received tithes from Abraham, he blessed Abraham, and he lived longer than Abraham.
7:9–10 In a sense even Levi himself paid tithes to Melchizedek since he was still in the loins of Abraham when Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek. In the ancient Near Eastern view of things, people regarded a descendant as in one sense participating in the actions of his ancestors (Gen. 25:23; Mal. 1:2–3; Rom. 9:11–13). This is true to reality in certain respects (cf. Rom. 5:12–21; 1 Cor. 15:22), though we are responsible for our own actions too (Ezek. 18:20). Levi, the head of the priestly tribe in Israel, had not yet begun his independent existence, but he was involved in everything that Abraham did.[234].